I’ve always found it interesting how people describe their jobs, particularly scientists. Sometimes I find the “inevitable dinner party question” (“So, what do you do?”) difficult. The answer typically requires knowing the background of the inquirer … if your job description is too technical, it tends to freak people out, and can often cause the evenings conversation to disintegrate into too much science-talk (yes, sometimes it’s possible to have too much science-talk). The safer option, giving a simplified very high-level job description geared toward lay-people, is usually unsatisfying and can even sound a bit insulting if you are unknowingly speaking to someone with experience in your field.
Overall, I think it’s really good practice to be able to describe your job (or “role”, or “work”) as a scientist at many different levels. It certainly helps me understand “what I do”, and can really assist in having the right words on-hand when writing grants, fellowship applications, abstracts and maybe even (gasp) press-releases, each that could be aimed at widely differing audiences.
What got me thinking so philosophically this morning ? A tongue-in-cheek quote I noticed on a lab head’s page describing his role in the research group:
Gets the big pay check, sits around waiting for results, drinks coffee, helps write papers and tells people to work harder.
I’m sure he does a little more than that … but I suspect there’s also a bit of refreshing honesty in that description. Probably every part is true, except the “sits around waiting” part. I wouldn’t try using it to describe your role on a grant application though 🙂