Comments on: texshade: useful, and still kickin’ http://blog.pansapiens.com/2008/04/29/texshade-useful-and-still-kickin/ Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:22:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: perry http://blog.pansapiens.com/2008/04/29/texshade-useful-and-still-kickin/#comment-69 perry Fri, 02 May 2008 08:36:18 +0000 http://blog.pansapiens.com/?p=50#comment-69 Glad to be of assistance :) So there are two papers, <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/7/313" rel="nofollow">the 2006 one</a> and the <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10842735" rel="nofollow">2000 one</a>. It's the 2006 paper that talks about the sequence logo features. Despite this, the best and most up-to-date texshade reference is probably the pdf manual that comes with the package on CTAN. Glad to be of assistance :)
So there are two papers, the 2006 one and the 2000 one. It’s the 2006 paper that talks about the sequence logo features. Despite this, the best and most up-to-date texshade reference is probably the pdf manual that comes with the package on CTAN.

]]> By: kay http://blog.pansapiens.com/2008/04/29/texshade-useful-and-still-kickin/#comment-68 kay Thu, 01 May 2008 19:20:59 +0000 http://blog.pansapiens.com/?p=50#comment-68 Thanks for bringing Texshade to my attention - I never heard of this program before. Texshade seems to have a number of advantages over Boxshade (from which it has borrowed several ideas), one of them being that Texshade is still actively maintained while Boxshade has been mothballed 12 years ago. BTW, the paper does not say that Texshade can do sequence logos - is this some more recent developments? Thanks for bringing Texshade to my attention - I never heard of this program before. Texshade seems to have a number of advantages over Boxshade (from which it has borrowed several ideas), one of them being that Texshade is still actively maintained while Boxshade has been mothballed 12 years ago.
BTW, the paper does not say that Texshade can do sequence logos - is this some more recent developments?

]]>