mPartsRegistry : small update

I just made a small update to mPartsRegistry, the mobile interface I wrote to make browsing the Registry of Standard Biological Parts a little easier on smartphones.

This update adds a “Random Part” button – it’s mostly just so people who want to play with it without actually knowing a part ID can get some instant gratification. This is in addition to the quiet update I made a few months ago to replace jQTouch with JQuery Mobile, since jQTouch development stagnated for a while and never really properly supported most mobile browsers.

Stack Exchange sites for science

Recently I’ve noticed the emergence of several Stack Overflow-style sites for science-related questions and answers. For those unfamiliar with Stack Overflow – it’s a question and answer ‘forum’ for computer programmers that keeps the signal-to-noise ratio very high through a carefully refined reputation system. Late last year the creators of Stack Overflow launched a hosted service called Stack Exchange, which allows anyone to start their own “Stack Overflow” based around any topic.

2363694735_507a4eea3b_o

http://www.flickr.com/photos/alicebartlett/ / CC BY-NC 2.0

The service is was a little pricey ($129+/month), and I suspect this is one reason why a few open source clones inspired by Stack Overflow also exist. Since then, Stack Exchange sites (or clones) have proliferated – and those working as scientists (or those interested in science) haven’t been neglected. Here are my favorites:
  • MajorGroove.org pitches itself as a ‘forum for biologists’, which it is, however most of the content currently focuses on X-ray crystallography and associated techniques. It is currently in ‘bootstrap mode’, which means that reputation requirements are a little less strict until the userbase and site activity has grown to a critical size. Is there even a need for a Stack Exchange forum for biological crystallography ? Macromolecular crystallography already has a single, central, de facto standard forum – the CCP4BB mailing list. While it may be antiquated by Web2.0 standards, CCP4BB works well for a lot of people, and there is a huge amount of useful and important information buried in it’s archives. For many crystallographers, it seems CCP4BB would only be extracted from their “cold dead hands”. Despite this, I think the Stack Overflow format will be very beneficial for people new to the field.  As a side note – I discovered MajorGroove via Graeme Winters XIA2 blog right around the time when I was considering kickstarting a “Stack Overflow for crystallography”. At the moment it seems that a small userbase of crystallographers is already established on MajorGroove and there would be no purpose for another near identical forum. Even if questions about other techniques in the biosciences start to dilute out the structural biology, one click on the ‘crystallography‘ tag or the ‘ccp4‘ tag, and you can get straight to the good stuff. (In fact this feature was deemed useful enough by Google that they decided to bless the ‘android‘ tag on Stack Overflow as the official Android Q&A forum).
  • NMRWiki Q&A (http://qa.nmrwiki.org/) is a StackExchange-clone for magnetic resonances, mostly focused on NMR, but also open to EPR/ESR and MRI users. It’s not actually running on the StackExchange platform, but uses the open source OSQA / CNPROG clone, built on top of Django. As far as I know, there is no “CCP4BB for NMR”, which makes the NMRWiki Q&A site potentially even more valuable to structural biologists than it’s crystallography centric cousin, MajorGroove. Back when I was doing my PhD using protein NMR spectroscopy as my primary technique, there were very few good resources like this online – I do less NMR these days, but you can bet that I’ll be using the NMRWiki Q&A and it’s associated wiki to refresh my memory and catch up on need methodological developments in the future.
  • BioStar (http://biostar.stackexchange.com/), a StackExchange for bioinformatics, computational genomics and systems biology questions and answers. This one is busier and better established than the above mentioned forums, probably by virtue of the fact the bioinformaticians spend more time in front of the computer than your average molecular biologist or structural biologist.
  • And, for a bit of fun: Skeptic Exchange (http://exchange.bristolskeptics.co.uk/), which covers rational questions and answers to various topics including pseudoscience, faith healing, the supernatural and alternative medicine.

Want more ? There are a bunch of science related StackExchanges listed under “Science” here: http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4/list-of-stackexchange-sites .. and digging back through the FriendFeed archives I see Matt Todd initiated a concise listing (which if I’d seen, I probably never would have started this post).

And now, the latest* news Stack Exchange 2.0 will be ‘free‘. It looks like they are trying to structure the new Stack Exchange ecosystem a bit like the Usenet hierarchy (comp.*, rec.* etc), with a fairly involved discussion, proposal and acceptance process for new sites – it’s unclear yet whether this approach is going to work out better than just open sourcing the whole shebang, but time will tell. My guess is that BioStar, MajorGroove and probably even an incarnation of NMRWiki Q&A will eventually become part of this formalized ecosystem.

On one hand making StackExchange sites free to run is great – it lowers the barrier to entry to allow many more sites to emerge and operate. On the other hand, as we have seen with the acquisition of FriendFeed by Facebook, not having a clear revenue stream can ultimately leave communities  (such as The Life Scientists) without any certainty in a sites future, potentially impacting growth and participation. Personally I’m much more inclined to invest time in a site if it is something like Wikipedia, where I know my contributions are very likely to live on, in some form, for decades (centuries ?) to come. Ideally the archives of these new Stack Exchange sites could become useful online resources for decades to come – but with a single company at the helm and a “Web 2.0 business model”, continued operation for even a decade seems unlikely. The one saving grace: all content on the new Stack Exchange sites will be licensed under a Creative Commons license – so if Stack Exchange itself is acquired and shut down, we will always be able to preemptively leech the archives and provide them online elsewhere. Maybe it’s strange that I’m already thinking about archiving the new Stack Exchange upon it’s demise before it’s even begun, but I think it’s important to take the long term view with our data and recorded wisdom. Unlike when in 1994 when GeoCities (R.I.P) was started, teh Internets is no longer a fad – the hard disks connected to it are fast becoming the sum of all accessible human knowledge, so we’d better make sure we can retain the good bits for a little longer than 10 years.

* – as all too common these days .. I’m a little behind the curve on this one. I meant to finish this post a month ago, but with a busy time pre-holiday, then the actual holiday, a month has gone by.

Delicious geohashes … mmmm … tagging *drool*

Since I got a new toy for Christmas, I’ve become interested in geolocation and the fun things you can do when you have an internet-connected GPS-enabled device in your pocket. I’m also a compulsive delicious tagger, so I quickly discovered the existing practice for geotagging delicious bookmarks.

Essentially, this seems to be: add the tag ‘geotagged‘, along with the tags ‘geo:lat=X.xxx‘ and ‘geo:lon=X.xxx‘, where the X.xxx‘s are the latitude and longtitude numbers that are likely to come straight out of your GPS, in decimal degrees (WGS84).

This is all very nice, but the problem with tags in this format is that there is no easy or efficient way to use them to retrieve all items tagged for a particular locality. Sure, if I’m standing right on top of the Eureka Tower at -37.821362,144.964213, I can search for tags geo:lat=-37.821362 and geo:lon=144.964213 to find all the geotagged links for that exact location, but what if I’m standing 50 metres across the street looking up at the tower and want to search for links near my current location ? Continue reading

Searching bioinformatic databases with YubNub

You may already be familiar with YubNub; it describes itself as “the social command line for the web”. Most commands consist of two (or more) words … one for the search engine, the other for the query.

For example, typing:

gg open science on friendfeed

into the YubNub search box searches Google for “open science on friendfeed“, via YubNub.

I thought I’d highlight a few life science- and bioinformatics-related YubNub commands I find myself using quite often in my day-to-day work. Some are commands I created, others someone else created. This is the beauty of YubNub … often someone has already made the ‘obvious’ command … it’s worth just trying to search with a command you expect to exist, since it often does.

Onward, with the list:

Continue reading

A “Web2.0 for Scientists Week”: signup-fest ?

So, here is my half-baked idea:

Why not have a special week where new online collaboration tools are promoted to scientists globally ?Silly logo Web2.0 for a Signupfest

Similar to the way local Linux user groups sometimes run “installfests” to install Linux for users, (just to get them over the initial interia), why not have a global “signup-fest” for the core set of online tools useful for scientific collaboration ? In each local area / University / Institute, a few Web2.0 savvy scientists could promote the event and hand-hold new users through the signup process, and help with basic usage and integration of tools. Ideally, lab groups could signup together in the same room, and make an event of it. Or in places with Wifi … a “bring your laptop” signup lunchtime event. I think you get the idea.
Continue reading